Home / Education / No Pakistani Varsity in Asia’s top 100
No Pakistani varsity in Asia's top 100

No Pakistani Varsity in Asia’s top 100

Times Higher Education (THE), a leading authority on world-class universities, has launched Asia University Rankings 2015.

Bad news for Pakistan: not even a single university could make it to the list.

India has nine representatives, down from eight last year, while Iran has three institutions in this year’s rankings– led by Sharif University of Technology (43rd).

Times Higher Education rankings for Asia used 13 performance indicators to examine each university’s strengths against its core missions: teaching, research, knowledge transfer and international outlook.

“The rankings are fine, the criteria are fine but Pakistan’s ground situation is not fine,” said Punjab University Registrar Dr Shahid Muneer.

“Of several concerns, one is that Pakistan lacks resources and hardly any allocations are made for research and development. In such a scenario, institutions find it hard to create a research culture,” Dr Muneer said.

Phil Baty, the editor of Times Higher Education, acknowledges the scarcity of funding for Pakistani universities. But he has a way out.

“It is not a simple task – to perform well in Times Higher Education’s university rankings an institution must be performing strongly across all of THE’s five core areas: teaching, research, citation impact, income from industry and international outlook,” he told Dawn.

“However, analysis of other countries across the region suggests that many are incorporating improving the competitiveness of their universities into their economic growth strategies.

“Having enough resources to forge alliances with global counterparts and encourage internationalisation through the co-authoring of academic papers, encouraging international students, enhancing links with industry and the increased use of English language can propel a country’s universities’ position in the rankings – as we have seen notably in the case of China and South Korea, who sit in first and third place in the rankings respectively,” said Baty

Dr Muneer said Pakistan was also a victim of brain drain since the country’s PhD scholars opt for jobs in greener pastures. “Our [Pakistan’s] student-teacher ratio is also poor at around 80 to 1. When there are no teachers, how can we perform?”

Having such a high ratio of students to teachers presents real problems in terms of dynamic and focused strategic leadership, and this is what is needed to develop world class research-led universities, said Baty.

“This is one of the core areas that Pakistan needs to focus on to move its education system forward – it is concerning for a country of its notoriety.”

English language is another issue, according to Dr Muneer, that restricts Pakistani universities’ work featuring on international scenes. “Most Pakistani universities are producing PhDs in local literature, in languages like Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi and Pashtu,” he said.

“English is the global language – to elevate itself in the tables and perform on an international level, Pakistan needs to start focusing on English. This will help its universities’ scores for citations, as well as its scores for international outlook, with it starting to share research projects and attract faculty and students from overseas,” said Baty.

This year’s tables reveal that China has overtaken Japan as the continent’s higher education powerhouse.

Although the latter still boasts the region’s number one institution— University of Tokyo— many of its universities have lost ground with 19 universities in the list this year, down from 20 last year and 22 in 2013.

By contrast, Mainland China has three new top 100 entrants, taking its total above Japan’s for the first time: China now has 21 representatives, up from 18 last year and 15 in 2013. Both Peking University (fourth) and Tsinghua University (fifth) have moved up a place.

Hong Kong University, retaining third place overall, leads a strong group from the Chinese special administrative region (SAR) – all six of Hong Kong’s ranked universities made the top 50.

Macau joins the table for the first time, with the University of Macau at joint 40th place.

South Korea is the third-strongest nation in the rankings with 13 representatives, down from 14 last year while Taiwan has 11 universities in the list, down from 13 last year and 17 in 2013.

India’s strength has also deteriorated slightly this year with nine representatives, down from eight in 2014.

India has a new number one – the Indian Institute of Science ranks 37th, one place ahead of last year’s leader, Panjab University. Five Indian institutes of technology led by IIT Roorkee (joint 55th) take the lion’s share of the country’s representation, although there is also room in the top 100 for Aligarh Muslim University (90th) and Jawaharlal Nehru University (96th).

Singapore has only two universities in the top 100, but both are highly placed: the National University of Singapore retains second place, while Nanyang Technological University moves into the top 10 for the first time.

Thailand has two representatives in this year’s tables. Its top-ranked institution, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, slips five places to a joint 55th, followed by Mahidol University, which continues its downward trend, dropping nine places to 91st.

The Middle East is well represented in the rankings, which cover the entire Asian continent.

Turkey has six institutions in the list this year, up from five last year, with all in the top 50. Middle East Technical University rose 17 places to 12th, largely attributable to its outstanding research impact. Boğaziçi University takes 14th position (up from joint 19th) and new entrant Sabancı University almost makes the top 20 in its debut appearance.

Four Israeli universities made the top 100, up from three in 2014.

Iran has three institutions in this year’s rankings, led by Sharif University of Technology (43rd). Isfahan University of Technology moved up 24 places to 61st, while the Iran University of Science and Technology enters the top 100 at joint 69th, replacing Tehran University of Medical Sciences, which has not been featured this year.

Saudi Arabia has two representatives, with King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals at 71st and King Saud University one position behind. Both institutions have made gains over last year.

Lebanon’s sole representative in the list is the American University of Beirut, which fell two places to a joint 88th.

No Pakistani Varsity in Asia’s top 100

Source: http://www.dawn.com/news/1187374/no-pakistani-varsity-in-asias-top-100

Download PDF

Check Also

001

Pak-Russia Relations: New Dimensions | Dr Qaisar Rashid

The limitation with the past is that it cannot be reconstructed but the plasticity with …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by themekiller.com